Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video46.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chelsea Janes results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 93 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (8,555 of 28,364 speakers). This Chelsea Janes is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Chelsea Janes
Speaker details
Total words: 46.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510069.8% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos46.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos