Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video26 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chelsea FC results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Actor-Observer Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 130 faulty-reasoning hits from 26 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (758 of 28,364 speakers). This Chelsea FC is worse (more manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group.
Chelsea FC
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 26
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

97% percentile
025507510097.3% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos26 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos