Speaker summary
⁠98%3 analyzed articles/videos84 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlie Kirk results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 54.8% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 167 faulty-reasoning hits from 84 analyzed words across 3 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 24.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (16,156 of 26,731 speakers). This Charlie Kirk is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
Charlie Kirk
Speaker details
Total words: 84
Content count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510039.6% percentile
24.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos84 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 54.8%54.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 54.8%54.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 17.9%17.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 13.1%13.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 17.9%17.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 54.8%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 54.8%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos