Fox News98%

'SPEAKING TO THE FUTURE': Ceremony marks burial of America250 time capsule 42%

7/4/2026, 3:00:37 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 179 hits. Analysis detected 1,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 836 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.1% and a BS Rank of 42% (12,778 of 21,887 videos). This video is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the video peer group.

All right, America 250 is burying a900-lb time capsule today inPhiladelphia. 
It won't be opened foranother 250 years. 
But, we can tell youit's filled with items from all 50states and all US territories. 
From acopy of the Constitution signed by allof the Supreme Court justices to aCoca-Cola bottle. 
Chief CongressionalCorrespondent Chad Pergram is live inPhiladelphia with more. 
Hey, Chad. 
>> Emily, good afternoon. Well, theceremony commemorating 250 years isreally about 500 years. 
They will openthis time capsule in the year 2276. 
And that's why today is not just aboutwhere we've been, but where we aregoing. 
>> Today, we're not simply celebrating thepast. 
We are speaking to the future. 
When this time capsule here to my leftis opened 250 years, but in a realsense, our voices will be. 
The Americans of 2276 
>> Multiple governors wrote letters for thetime capsule. 
Alaska sent its stateflag. 
Arkansas offered a diamond fromthe crater of Diamond State Park. 
Iowa submitted a space stationmedallion. 
That's for Peggy Whitson, thefirst female commander of theInternational Space Station. 
But, someitems failed to make the cut. 
>> Well, New York's next championship ringwould be incredible and perhaps even aWorld Cup for Team USA. 
Which remains tobe seen what happens, but they're ontheir way. 
>> Some items inside the capsule couldspark interest and scholarship. 
There'shope the capsule intrigues people in thefuture to study why certain things wereimportant to us today. 
>> And I think a lot of times is that whenyou start peeling back the onion, you'relike, "Wow, that was really incredible.I didn't know this person did X." Ithink that's the opportunity for thatdiscovery. 
>> Now, it will certainly be cooler inthe ground with the time capsule. 
The hightoday in Philadelphia, 102,but a lot cooler here 250 years ago. 
Youknow, Thomas Jefferson, he was prettymaniacal about keeping weather records. 
And one reading that he took on July4th, 1776, around 1:00 in the afternoon,76°. 
Very apropos. 
>> Isn't it though, Chad? All right, nowtell us, what is the most interestingitem do you think that's in the timecapsule? 
>> Well, I think that one of the thingsthat California sent in, they sent in anAI Claude prompt about what it thoughtthat the United States would look likein 2050. We don't know what it came upwith because it's in the time capsule. 
And something they could not put insidethe time capsule was a football. 
The reason is that the leather from thefootball would degrade over 250 years. 
>> Well, that football better have comefrom the former Oakland Raiders, but I don't think it did. 
But that's okay. 
All right, guys, thank you so much and staycool out there, Chad. 
All right, we're going to talk about ita little bit on the couch. 
So, allright, Katie, we talked about this sortof in just in a commercial break. 
Whatwould we put in the time capsule if wecould? What What's something that youwould put in? 
>> I would put in a revolving series ofclips of Charlie Kirk. 
And when I thinkabout America 250, I think about hislove of country, his love ofChristianity. 
Um I It's something that I think 250years from now, if we were broadcastingout, I would say, "Listen to this man.Listen to what he said. Listen to howfaith is at the center of our nation." 
He said just before he passed toLawrence Jones on Fox and Friends, hethought we were on the precipice of aChristian revival in this country, and Ibelieve his assassination spearheadedthat. So, I would put his infinitewisdom and all those who have listenedand all the lives he's changedum in on for his unfortunate death inthat time capsule. Um make heavencrowded was his goal and he has donejust that and that there's no moreworthy thing to put in a time capsule. 
>> That's beautiful. 
I shall allow 
>> Well, um I was going to do a comedictake on this um but that was really sincere and heartfelt. 
Um I was going tosay something First of all, we shouldhave put a Coke Zero or a Diet Coke inthere cuz who who the heck is stilldrinking a regular Coke? 
>> good point. 
>> Um also, I would put in just like an 
iPhone. 
I mean, we live on thesedevices. 
So, I would have put in a bunchof different gadgets that we just likeare you know, use every single day so 
that in 200 years or whatever they openit, they can laugh at us. 
>> You know what I'm still fascinated aboutis when you travel the country, I'mstill amazed that you know, 250 years inthat you still go to the Carolinas andyou go to Alabama and you have differentaccents. People have different accentsin New England than they do in Seattleand they do in California and it'samazing. 
I would try to go around theworld and get different accents ofdifferent people and then 250 years fromnow, see if it's still like that. 
I knowit was 250 years ago, but it seemsunusual that we still have all these 
unusual that we still have all these 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.1%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias4.1%This article: 2.8%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias2.8%This article: 9.2%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic9.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 4.2%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias4.2%This article: 13.3%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias13.3%This article: 4.1%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.3%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.0%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias11.0%This article: 5.7%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias5.7%This article: 1.8%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias1.8%This article: 2.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias2.0%This article: 10.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error10.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias1.4%This article: 6.2%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias6.2%This article: 6.5%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect6.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias6.2%This article: 2.5%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 3.6%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man3.6%This article: 14.8%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority14.8%This article: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.3%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization8.3%This article: 1.1%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring1.1%This article: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.4%This article: 21.4%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion21.4%This article: 1.7%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question1.7%This article: 13.6%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof1.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.5%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division2.5%This article: 19.5%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal19.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.2%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.5%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground2.5%This article: 5.6%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity5.6%This article: 9.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading9.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

836 words analyzed.

Speakers

10speakers23%attributed speech641writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageChad Pergram • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageEmily • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAlaska • 4 words • 0.0% coverageArkansas • 10 words • 0.0% coverageIowa • 5 words • 0.0% coveragePeggy Whitson • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Jefferson • 10 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Jefferson • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageKatie • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageCharlie Kirk • 12 words • 0.0% coverageCharlie Kirk • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageLawrence Jones • 78 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 52 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lawrence Jones

100%flagged-word coverage
78 attributed words40% of attributed speech86% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.