Speaker summary
⁠81%2 analyzed articles/videos36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Schwab results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 80.6% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 87 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 80.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,145 of 28,364 speakers). This Charles Schwab is worse (more manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group.
Charles Schwab
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510081.9% percentile
80.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 80.6%80.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 80.6%80.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 80.6%80.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 80.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 80.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 80.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos