Speaker summary
⁠82%2 analyzed articles/videos186.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chad Tracy results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Optimism Bias, and Begging the Question, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 41.8% saturation with 120 hits. Analysis detected 383.696 faulty-reasoning hits from 186.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,650 of 28,364 speakers). This Chad Tracy is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Chad Tracy
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 186.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510027.2% percentile
17.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos186.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 41.8%41.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 39.5%39.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 26.3%26.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 41.8%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 39.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos