Speaker summary
⁠98%2 analyzed articles/videos48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cecilia Lunaparra results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Primacy Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 144 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (6,714 of 26,862 speakers). This Cecilia Lunaparra is worse (more manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Cecilia Lunaparra
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.0% percentile
60.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Primacy Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.0%Primacy EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos