Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carnell "Speck Nasty" Specks IV results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Self-Serving Bias, and False Dilemma, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 289.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (21,545 of 28,364 speakers). This Carnell "Speck Nasty" Specks IV is better (less manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Carnell "Speck Nasty" Specks IV
Speaker details
Total words: 156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510024.0% percentile
15.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos156 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 39.7%39.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.1%9.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 6.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos