Speaker summary
⁠78%3 analyzed articles/videos582.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carly Phillips results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 1,424.909 faulty-reasoning hits from 582.5 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (26,316 of 28,364 speakers). This Carly Phillips is better (less manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Carly Phillips
Speaker details
Total words: 582.5
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751007.2% percentile
7.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos582.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 15.9%15.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.2%8.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.5%11.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos