Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video134 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carlos Martens Bilongo results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, In-Group Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 134 hits. Analysis detected 737 faulty-reasoning hits from 134 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 78.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,208 of 28,364 speakers). This Carlos Martens Bilongo is worse (more manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group.
Carlos Martens Bilongo
Speaker details
Total words: 134
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510081.6% percentile
78.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos134 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos