Speaker summary
72%4 analyzed articles/videos268.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Candace Laing results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 85.875 hits. Analysis detected 550 faulty-reasoning hits from 268.5 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 13% and a BS Rank of 18% (23,251 of 28,364 speakers). This Candace Laing is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510018.0% percentile
13.0% BS Score4 analyzed videos268.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 32.0%32.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 23.5%23.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.2%6.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate