Speaker summary
⁠51%3 analyzed articles/videos110.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Highway Patrol results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 38.9% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 237.674 faulty-reasoning hits from 110.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 25.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,528 of 28,364 speakers). This California Highway Patrol is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
California Highway Patrol
Speaker details
Total words: 110.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510041.7% percentile
25.8% BS Score3 analyzed videos110.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 38.9%38.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 40.8%40.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 40.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 38.9%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos