Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video16 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Energy Commission results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 32 faulty-reasoning hits from 16 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (603 of 28,364 speakers). This California Energy Commission is worse (more manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group.
California Energy Commission
Speaker details
Total words: 16
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

98% percentile
025507510097.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos16 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos