Speaker summary
52%3 analyzed articles/videos98.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Department of Fish and Wildlife results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 45.9% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 293.469 faulty-reasoning hits from 98.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.2% and a BS Rank of 29% (20,207 of 28,364 speakers). This California Department of Fish and Wildlife is better (less manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Speaker details
Total words: 98.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510028.8% percentile
18.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos98.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 45.9%45.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 37.6%37.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 16.3%16.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 45.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 37.6%, sitewide 9.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate