A Shark May Have Bit a Surfer at Moonstone Beach Yesterday 57%

By Dezmond Remington70%

7/20/2026, 7:52:08 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Status Quo Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 654 faulty-reasoning hits from 304 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (9,436 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the article peer group.

A shark may have bit a surfer over the weekend at Moonstone Beach, though authorities said it went officially unreported. 
It nibbled a wedge out of a foam board yesterday at around 10 a.m., a surfer who was nearby told the Outpost, its bite barely punching through the man’s wetsuit. 
The victim was rattled but uninjured. 
The other surfers in the lineup, somewhere around a half dozen of them, paddled back to shore and told other surfers getting ready on the beach to stay there. 
It was a 10-foot long juvenile great white, the surfer who spoke with us claimed, and he said the victim “fought” the shark, putting his board between him and it before paddling to shore. 
Incidents like these shouldn’t be called an “attack,” per the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 
Shark bites are an extraordinarily rare event, and it’s almost never because they’re hunting us; it’s usually because they’re “investigating unusual objects in their environment,” says the CDFW. 
(Like a surfboard.) 
CDFW spokesman Peter Tira told the Outpost that no one reported the incident to the sheriff’s office or to CDFW. 
Skipping that step is a mistake, he said; the agency keeps bite incident data going back to the ‘50s, and keeping the record complete helps other beach-goers be aware of any potential dangers. 
They also could have determined what kind of shark it was by scraping some DNA off of the board. 
“But we don’t have that opportunity if it’s not reported to us,” Tira said, “or another public safety entity like the police or sheriff’s office.” 
The Humboldt County Sheriff's Office did not respond to a request for comment. 
The victim couldn't be reached. 
(If that’s you, would you please consider contacting Dezmond Remington at dezmond@lostcoastoutpost.com?) 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.6%Dezmond Remington: 2.2%Lost Coast Outpost: 3.1%Confirmation Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 18.8%Dezmond Remington: 12.6%Lost Coast Outpost: 3.4%Availability Heuristic18.8%This article: 9.2%Dezmond Remington: 3.1%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic9.2%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Dezmond Remington: 11.2%Lost Coast Outpost: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias11.2%This article: 9.9%Dezmond Remington: 5.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 4.7%Framing Effect9.9%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 19.1%Dezmond Remington: 6.4%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.8%Status Quo Bias19.1%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.6%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 3.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.6%Dezmond Remington: 2.9%Lost Coast Outpost: 8.3%Negativity Bias8.6%This article: 11.2%Dezmond Remington: 3.7%Lost Coast Outpost: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias11.2%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 3.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 1.6%Dezmond Remington: 0.5%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 31.9%Dezmond Remington: 13.7%Lost Coast Outpost: 3.8%Appeal to Authority31.9%This article: 8.2%Dezmond Remington: 2.7%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.5%False Dilemma8.2%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 15.8%Dezmond Remington: 5.3%Lost Coast Outpost: 2.5%Hasty Generalization15.8%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 8.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 10.9%Dezmond Remington: 3.6%Lost Coast Outpost: 1.0%Burden of Proof10.9%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 21.1%Dezmond Remington: 17.8%Lost Coast Outpost: 3.2%Anecdotal21.1%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.2%Dezmond Remington: 3.7%Lost Coast Outpost: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.2%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.3%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.0%Middle Ground1.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 6.3%Dezmond Remington: 2.1%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.3%Special Pleading6.3%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.6%Dezmond Remington: 1.2%Lost Coast Outpost: 5.7%Biased Writer Voice3.6%This article: 5.3%Dezmond Remington: 5.4%Lost Coast Outpost: 4.6%Indoctrination5.3%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dezmond Remington: 0.0%Lost Coast Outpost: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Dezmond Remington: 1.3%Lost Coast Outpost: 2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.9%

304 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers44%attributed speech169writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageCalifornia Department of Fish and Wildlife • 16 words • 100.0% coverageCalifornia Department of Fish and Wildlife • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coveragePeter Tira • 20 words • 0.0% coveragePeter Tira • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coveragePeter Tira • 25 words • 0.0% coverageHumboldt County Sheriff's Office • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
44 attributed words33% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Indoctrination+36.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%California Department of Fish and Wildlife: 36.4%36.4%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.1 ptsWriter: 7.1%California Department of Fish and Wildlife: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.5 ptsWriter: 6.5%California Department of Fish and Wildlife: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.