Keyword summary
28% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humboldt County results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 807 hits . Analysis detected 9,994 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,016 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,577 of 37,533 keywords). This Humboldt County is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group. Humboldt County
Keyword details
Total words: 13,016
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst