Author summary
33% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sage Alexander results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Indoctrination , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 434 hits . Analysis detected 3,226 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,088 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,183 of 6,348 authors). This Sage Alexander is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group. Sage Alexander
Author details
Total words: 5,088
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst