Keyword summary
⁠30%2 analyzed articles/videos304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Department Of Fish And Wildlife results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 514 hits. Analysis detected 4,788 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,752 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (27,951 of 37,536 keywords). This California Department Of Fish And Wildlife is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
California Department Of Fish And Wildlife
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 5,752
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510025.5% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos