Keyword summary
17% 4 analyzed articles/videos 903 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shark results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 919 hits . Analysis detected 4,801 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,797 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,766 of 37,536 keywords). This Shark is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group. Shark
Keyword details
Total words: 8,797
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst