Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Brianna Randall results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Hasty Generalization, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 14 hits. Analysis detected 32 faulty-reasoning hits from 360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Brianna Randall is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Brianna Randall
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Brianna Randall (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 360
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles360 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos