Speaker summary
⁠76%4 analyzed articles/videos127.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These British government results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 87.9% saturation with 132.238 hits. Analysis detected 824.238 faulty-reasoning hits from 127.667 analyzed words across 4 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 34.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,231 of 28,364 speakers). This British government is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
British government
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠54%British government (selected)35%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 127.667
Content count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
34.7% BS Score4 analyzed videos127.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 87.9%87.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 41.4%41.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 34.7%34.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 25.9%25.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 25.9%25.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 41.4%41.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 15.5%15.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 87.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 41.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 41.4%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos