Speaker summary
⁠44%3 analyzed articles/videos252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Trascher results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 84.934 hits. Analysis detected 287.445 faulty-reasoning hits from 252 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 15% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (22,017 of 28,364 speakers). This Brian Trascher is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Brian Trascher
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510022.4% percentile
15.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos252 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 26.4%26.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 10.2%10.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos