Speaker summary
50%6 analyzed articles/videos264.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Fitzpatrick results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 62.485 hits. Analysis detected 312.485 faulty-reasoning hits from 264.667 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,344 of 28,293 speakers). This Brian Fitzpatrick is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Brian Fitzpatrick

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.9% percentile
7.8% BS Score6 analyzed videos264.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate