Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Igor Bobic results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 506 hits . Analysis detected 4,659 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of â 57% (2,890 of 6,628 authors). This Igor Bobic is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group. Igor Bobic
Author details
Total words: 4,432
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.4% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 7.9%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst