Speaker summary
⁠40%3 analyzed articles/videos79.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Armstrong results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 39.2% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 215 faulty-reasoning hits from 79.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,893 of 28,364 speakers). This Brian Armstrong is better (less manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Brian Armstrong
Speaker details
Total words: 79.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510033.4% percentile
20.8% BS Score3 analyzed videos79.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 39.2%39.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 31.1%31.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 39.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos