Speaker summary
⁠54%2 analyzed articles/videos93.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brett Leatherman results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 53.3% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 194 faulty-reasoning hits from 93.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 31.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,244 of 28,364 speakers). This Brett Leatherman is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Brett Leatherman
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.8% percentile
31.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos93.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 53.3%53.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.5%29.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.5%29.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 29.5%29.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 53.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 19.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 4.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos