Speaker summary
⁠69%2 analyzed articles/videos83 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brett Guthrie results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, In-Group Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 77.5% saturation with 84.459 hits. Analysis detected 318.459 faulty-reasoning hits from 83 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 30.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,643 of 28,364 speakers). This Brett Guthrie is better (less manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
Brett Guthrie
Speaker details
Total words: 83
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510048.4% percentile
30.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos83 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 77.5%77.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 27.5%27.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 27.5%27.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 77.5%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 11.1%Primacy Effect: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos