Publication summary
8% 1 analyzed article/video 2,314 analyzed words
BS Summary: These POWER Magazine results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 448 hits . Analysis detected 2,803 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,942 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 28% (291 of 399 publications). This POWER Magazine is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 6,942
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.1% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Straw Man: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Primacy Effect: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst