Speaker summary
⁠78%2 analyzed articles/videos153.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bret Kenwell results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Recency Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 38.3% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 454.917 faulty-reasoning hits from 153.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 25.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,616 of 28,364 speakers). This Bret Kenwell is better (less manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Bret Kenwell
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 153.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510041.4% percentile
25.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos153.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 38.3%38.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 34.4%34.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 38.3%38.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 17.4%17.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 38.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 38.3%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 34.4%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 15.9%Composition/Division: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos