Speaker summary
⁠78%2 analyzed articles/videos134.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Hoylman-Sigal results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 55.7% saturation with 84.375 hits. Analysis detected 487.597 faulty-reasoning hits from 134.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 31.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,309 of 28,364 speakers). This Brad Hoylman-Sigal is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Brad Hoylman-Sigal
Speaker details
Total words: 134.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.6% percentile
31.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos134.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 55.7%55.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 52.5%52.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 23.8%23.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 40.6%40.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.8%23.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 55.7%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 52.5%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 40.6%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos