Speaker summary
⁠42%2 analyzed articles/videos173.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Cenko results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 43.16 hits. Analysis detected 218.027 faulty-reasoning hits from 173.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 13% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (23,254 of 28,364 speakers). This Brad Cenko is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group.
Brad Cenko
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 173.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510018.0% percentile
13.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos173.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos