Speaker summary
⁠35%4 analyzed articles/videos144.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Blair Berk results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Burden of Proof, and Self-Serving Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 136 faulty-reasoning hits from 144.5 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (23,645 of 28,364 speakers). This Blair Berk is better (less manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Blair Berk
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 144.5
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510016.6% percentile
12.4% BS Score4 analyzed videos144.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos