Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video69 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Haslam results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 51.75 hits. Analysis detected 189.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 69 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,502 of 28,364 speakers). This Bill Haslam is worse (more manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
Bill Haslam
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 69
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.6% percentile
56.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos69 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos