Speaker summary
⁠42%2 analyzed articles/videos182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Cassidy (R-La.) results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 124 faulty-reasoning hits from 182 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (22,887 of 28,364 speakers). This Bill Cassidy (R-La.) is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Bill Cassidy (R-La.)
Speaker details
Total words: 182
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.3% percentile
13.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos182 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 26.4%26.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.2%30.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.2%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos