Speaker summary
⁠82%2 analyzed articles/videos172 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Conboy results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 35.8% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 288.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 172 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 39.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (11,991 of 28,364 speakers). This Ben Conboy is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Ben Conboy
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 172
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.7% percentile
39.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos172 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 72.4%72.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.4%50.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 35.8%35.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Halo Effect: Speaker 72.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.4%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 35.8%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos