Speaker summary
⁠39%5 analyzed articles/videos111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beijing results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 66.3% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 379 faulty-reasoning hits from 111 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 30.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,066 of 26,953 speakers). This Beijing is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Beijing
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.8% percentile
30.4% BS Score5 analyzed videos111 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 66.3%66.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 51.1%51.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 33.1%33.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.2%15.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 66.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 51.1%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 33.1%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos