Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video114.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beau B. Brindley results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 60.5% saturation with 98 hits. Analysis detected 316 faulty-reasoning hits from 114.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,444 of 28,364 speakers). This Beau B. Brindley is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Beau B. Brindley
Speaker details
Total words: 114.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510035.0% percentile
21.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos114.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 60.5%60.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 33.3%33.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 60.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 0.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos