Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video126 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bay Nature results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Optimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 42.9% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 162 faulty-reasoning hits from 126 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,241 of 28,364 speakers). This Bay Nature is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
Bay Nature
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 126
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.4% percentile
42.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos126 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 42.9%42.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 42.9%42.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 42.9%42.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 42.9%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 42.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 42.9%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos