Speaker summary
⁠79%5 analyzed articles/videos181.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ayanna Pressley results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Pessimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35.7% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 439.923 faulty-reasoning hits from 181.667 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,508 of 28,364 speakers). This Ayanna Pressley is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Ayanna Pressley
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510027.7% percentile
17.7% BS Score5 analyzed videos181.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 49.4%49.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 34.0%34.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 35.7%35.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 9.4%9.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 49.4%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 35.7%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 34.0%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos