Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Austin Bauricther results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Begging the Question, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 162 hits. Analysis detected 435 faulty-reasoning hits from 162 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,249 of 28,364 speakers). This Austin Bauricther is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Austin Bauricther
Speaker details
Total words: 162
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510056.8% percentile
38.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos162 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 58.0%58.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 29.0%29.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 29.0%29.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 58.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos