Speaker summary
⁠51%4 analyzed articles/videos425.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashish Jha results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 797.787 faulty-reasoning hits from 425.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (26,814 of 28,364 speakers). This Ashish Jha is better (less manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group.
Ashish Jha
Speaker details
Total words: 425.667
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751005.5% percentile
6.9% BS Score4 analyzed videos425.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.2%7.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.5%7.5%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 15.9%Tu Quoque: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%No True Scotsman: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos