California Dems' huge dilemma over governor race  and why they fear 'getting egg on their face' 36%

By Zain Khan61%

6/1/2026, 3:15:56 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41.9% saturation with 548 hits. Analysis detected 3,088 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,309 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.8% and a BS Rank of 36% (14,190 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the article peer group.

California Democrats are going to be forced to endorse a gubernatorial candidate none of them want because the talent pool is so weak, experts have claimed. 
Party bigwigs are likely going to row in behind Xavier Becerra as he leads the field of lackluster left-wing candidates ahead of the primary on Tuesday. 
It comes as powerbrokers such as Gavin Newsom, Kamala Harris and Nancy Pelosi have remained silent for months on who their preferred choice is. 
A Republican official claimed to The Post it is because they have a “lack of enthusiasm” for the Democratic candidates who offer “no excitement” while campaigning. 
Meanwhile one strategist said they believe Newsom and Harris are refusing to come forward in case they “get egg on their face” ahead of their expected presidential runs. 
Even Democrat party chairman Rusty Hicks avoided the question multiple times in an an excruciating interview over the weekend, refusing to even admit he was happy Becerra was in the running. 
When asked repeatedly about Becerra during an interview shared over the weekend, the party chairman refused to endorse him or even say he was glad he was in the race. 
He simply told KCRA: “I don’t think anyone could have predicted as to how this race would turn out.” 
The Post reached out to the Democrats to ask whether an endorsement was imminent. 
The party did not respond. 
The party has remained reluctant to rally around any one candidate. 
At February’s California Democratic Party convention, no contender came close to securing the 60% support required to earn the party’s endorsement. 
Swalwell led the field with about 24%, while Becerra finished third with 3%. 
“Everyone who endorsed Swalwell was embarrassed. 
No-one wants a repeat of that,” Democratic political consultant Steven Maviglio told The Post. 
Harris, Pelosi and Newsom have all declined to endorse a candidate in the race, even as they have weighed in on other contests across the state, including backing Karen Bass for LA mayor. 
Newsom has made clear he wants a Democrat to win  just not which Democrat. 
“I’m supporting a Democrat in the runoff and look forward to the voters making that decision very shortly,” Newsom said in April, saying he is “absolutely confident” a Democrat will emerge from the June 2 primary election. 
Biden has likewise remained on the sidelines. 
Becerra served as secretary of Health and Human Services in his administration, yet the former president has not endorsed him. 
But he has endorsed several former administration officials in other races, including former Deputy Cabinet Secretary Dan Koh in the Massachusetts 6th Congressional District Democratic primary and ex-White House Director of Public Engagement Keisha Lance Bottoms in her bid for Georgia governor. 
The Post reached out to the former president’s office to ask why he had withheld an endorsement for Becerra. 
Newsom, Pelosi and Harris were also asked whether they were considering weighing in before Tuesday’s election, but did not respond. 
“There’s a scenario where Gov. 
Newsom could have endorsed, but now is not that time,” said Maviglio, president of a Sacramento-based public affairs firm. 
He said the race remains “so fluid and without a frontrunner,” which has fueled hesitation among top Democrats. 
Maviglio added endorsements are typically a signal to voters about shared values and argued that support from leaders like Newsom or Pelosi can be “jet fuel to a campaign.” 
“The governor isn’t endorsing because he has presidential ambitions and if his endorsed candidate lost it would be egg on his face,” Maviglio claimed. 
“It’s in the nature of these elected officials to be risk-averse, and all the state’s leading Democrats have had long relationships with Steyer and Becerra.” 
Corrin Rankin, chairwoman of the California Republican Party, sees things differently. 
“I think it’s due to the lack of enthusiasm. 
I don’t think they can get voters excited. 
They’re not enthusiastic about any of the Democratic gubernatorial contenders,” Rankin told the Post. 
“You remember Eric Swalwell was the guy everybody was rallying behind. 
And then we all know what happened. 
The rest is history.” 
“A lot of times it’s what people don’t say that says everything. 
So the fact that they are not weighing in on Xavier Becerra means there’s something that they know that we don’t know yet,” Rankin added. 
“I think it’s very telling.” 
Rankin noted the lack of endorsements can also be due to “baggage” that candidates may bring, but did not elaborate. 
She noted the Republican Party was evenly split between Hilton and Chad Bianco at its convention and did not issue an endorsement, though she said the party would unite behind whichever candidate advances. 
Informally, Republicans have largely rallied behind Hilton after receiving the endorsement of President Donald Trump. 
Oil companies are making a cash splash in the final stretch of the race to back Becerra, drawing criticism from rival Steyer, who has attacked him for accepting oil industry contributions. 
Becerra has also faced political and media backlash over a recent on-camera exchange with KTLA reporter Annie Rose Ramos, where he appeared to push back on questions and asked, “this is not a gotcha piece, right?” 
His record in the Biden administration has also come under renewed scrutiny. 
Following a recent CNN debate, former Justice Department spokesperson Xochitl Hinojosa said Becerra “was not effective in government,” though former White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain called the criticism “profoundly unfair,” and former COVID response coordinator Dr. 
Ashish Jha defended Becerra’s handling of a difficult portfolio. 
There have also been reports of internal frustrations within the White House over Becerra’s management style, including delays tied to migrant child processing at the southern border. 
Separately, Politico reported skepticism among some former Biden staffers regarding Becerra’s political standing, with one staffer saying of internal polling, “It gets the biggest laugh every time we send around a poll,” referring to his performance ahead of the June primary. 
Additional attention has been drawn to Becerra’s political orbit following developments in a criminal case involving a former California political aide. 
Former California political aide Dana Williamson pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud, filing a false tax return, and making false statements to the FBI. 
The case involved a scheme to steal about $225,000 from a dormant campaign account belonging to Xavier Becerra, whom authorities say was the victim. 
The Becerra campaign did not respond to The Post’s requests for comment regarding the lack of endorsements from former colleagues and other Democratic power brokers. 
Matt Klink, a political strategist, argued the lack of endorsements may actually benefit voters. 
“Elite coordination reduces uncertainty. 
If influential figures like Newsom, Pelosi, Harris, or Biden all move in the same direction, it can create a perception of consensus,” he said. 
“Conversely, when those leaders are divided or silent, voters are more likely to make independent judgments and keep their options open.” 
California’s jungle primary was backed by former Gov. 
Arnold Schwarzenegger as a way to transform state politics, forcing candidates to appeal to voters across party lines and ultimately elevating more moderate politicians. 
On June 2, the top two vote-getters, regardless of party affiliation, will advance to the general election. 
“In modern primaries, particularly for Democrats, endorsements tend to follow momentum more often than they create it,” Klink said. 
“The lack of endorsements in the governor’s race highlights the uncertainty that still exists, particularly among Democratic and decline-to-state voters.” 
A growing number of California Democrats are embracing an unusual election strategy ahead of the state’s crowded gubernatorial primary: waiting until the final possible moment to cast their ballots. 
The tactic is being fueled by anxiety within left-wing circles over the state’s open primary system, where the top two candidates advance to the November election regardless of party affiliation  a format commonly known as the “jungle primary.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.4%Zain Khan: 3.7%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 0.4%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Zain Khan: 2.6%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic6.0%This article: 1.8%Zain Khan: 0.9%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic1.8%This article: 0.5%Zain Khan: 0.1%California Post: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.5%This article: 1.5%Zain Khan: 0.8%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias1.5%This article: 2.8%Zain Khan: 10.9%California Post: 10.3%Framing Effect2.8%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 0.6%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.3%Zain Khan: 0.6%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.3%Zain Khan: 1.5%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias6.3%This article: 12.0%Zain Khan: 1.5%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias12.0%This article: 41.9%Zain Khan: 15.5%California Post: 16.0%Negativity Bias41.9%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 1.3%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 8.2%Zain Khan: 1.9%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error8.2%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Zain Khan: 0.7%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.8%This article: 2.5%Zain Khan: 1.1%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.5%This article: 0.7%Zain Khan: 1.3%California Post: 3.1%Halo Effect0.7%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 0.2%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.0%Zain Khan: 1.4%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias4.0%This article: 1.0%Zain Khan: 0.6%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect1.0%This article: 1.5%Zain Khan: 0.1%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 1.4%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 0.1%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.3%Zain Khan: 5.2%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority10.3%This article: 4.7%Zain Khan: 1.1%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma4.7%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 0.0%California Post: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.4%Zain Khan: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.4%This article: 10.8%Zain Khan: 3.6%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization10.8%This article: 5.7%Zain Khan: 0.8%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring5.7%This article: 3.4%Zain Khan: 1.3%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon3.4%This article: 7.7%Zain Khan: 6.2%California Post: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion7.7%This article: 3.7%Zain Khan: 0.8%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question3.7%This article: 17.0%Zain Khan: 2.7%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)17.0%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 0.4%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.5%Zain Khan: 0.7%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof1.5%This article: 1.9%Zain Khan: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature1.9%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 0.2%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.2%Zain Khan: 2.7%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal8.2%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.6%Zain Khan: 2.7%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.6%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 0.1%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 0.5%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 1.2%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.2%Zain Khan: 4.0%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote13.2%This article: 6.9%Zain Khan: 2.0%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection6.9%This article: 27.3%Zain Khan: 8.9%California Post: 13.1%Biased Writer Voice27.3%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 2.2%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 3.0%Zain Khan: 1.5%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias3.0%This article: 2.4%Zain Khan: 4.4%California Post: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Zain Khan: 1.1%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1309 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers41%attributed speech769writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageRusty Hicks • 31 words • 100.0% coverageRusty Hicks • 30 words • 0.0% coverageRusty Hicks • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSteven Maviglio • 6 words • 100.0% coverageSteven Maviglio • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageSteven Maviglio • 5 words • 0.0% coverageSteven Maviglio • 19 words • 0.0% coverageSteven Maviglio • 18 words • 0.0% coverageSteven Maviglio • 29 words • 100.0% coverageSteven Maviglio • 24 words • 100.0% coverageSteven Maviglio • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageCorrin Rankin • 9 words • 0.0% coverageCorrin Rankin • 8 words • 0.0% coverageCorrin Rankin • 14 words • 0.0% coverageCorrin Rankin • 11 words • 0.0% coverageCorrin Rankin • 7 words • 0.0% coverageCorrin Rankin • 4 words • 0.0% coverageCorrin Rankin • 12 words • 0.0% coverageCorrin Rankin • 25 words • 100.0% coverageCorrin Rankin • 5 words • 0.0% coverageCorrin Rankin • 20 words • 0.0% coverageCorrin Rankin • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageXochitl Hinojosa • 38 words • 100.0% coverageAshish Jha • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Klink • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Klink • 24 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Klink • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Klink • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Klink • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Xochitl Hinojosa

100%flagged-word coverage
38 attributed words7.0% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+96.4 ptsWriter: 3.6%Xochitl Hinojosa: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-35.4 ptsWriter: 35.4%Xochitl Hinojosa: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-19.2 ptsWriter: 19.2%Xochitl Hinojosa: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-5.1 ptsWriter: 5.1%Xochitl Hinojosa: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -4.0 ptsWriter: 4.0%Xochitl Hinojosa: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.