Speaker summary
⁠53%3 analyzed articles/videos305.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Xochitl Hinojosa results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 943.188 faulty-reasoning hits from 305.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (26,502 of 28,364 speakers). This Xochitl Hinojosa is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group.
Xochitl Hinojosa
Speaker details
Total words: 305.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.6% percentile
7.6% BS Score3 analyzed videos305.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.1%6.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Straw Man: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 0.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.4%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%No True Scotsman: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos