Speaker summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 393 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arden Robert results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Loss Aversion , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 92.798 hits . Analysis detected 596.433 faulty-reasoning hits from 393 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (25,545 of 26,730 speakers). This Arden Robert is better (less manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group. Arden Robert
Speaker details
Total words: 393
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.4% percentile 6.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos393 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 20.6% 20.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst