Speaker summary
65%5 analyzed articles/videos157 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antonio Guterres results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 366.515 faulty-reasoning hits from 157 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 20% and a BS Rank of 33% (19,259 of 28,364 speakers). This Antonio Guterres is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510032.1% percentile
20.0% BS Score5 analyzed videos157 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 28.5%28.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 21.3%21.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.3%21.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Recency Bias: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 0.4%Recency BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate