Speaker summary
57%1 analyzed article/video133.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ankit Panda results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 35% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 310.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 133.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.6% and a BS Rank of 38% (17,578 of 28,364 speakers). This Ankit Panda is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
Ankit Panda
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 133.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510038.0% percentile
23.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos133.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 45.0%45.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 35.0%35.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 21.3%21.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.0%15.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 45.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 35.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos