Speaker summary
⁠70%2 analyzed articles/videos622 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Cuomo results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Straw Man, Hasty Generalization, and False Dilemma, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 124.646 hits. Analysis detected 1,144.776 faulty-reasoning hits from 622 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (27,138 of 28,364 speakers). This Andrew Cuomo is better (less manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group.
Andrew Cuomo
Speaker details
Total words: 622
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751004.3% percentile
6.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos622 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.4%4.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos