Speaker summary
⁠84%2 analyzed articles/videos22 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrea Picciotti-Bayer results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 90.9% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 40 faulty-reasoning hits from 22 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 90.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,870 of 28,364 speakers). This Andrea Picciotti-Bayer is worse (more manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group.
Andrea Picciotti-Bayer
Speaker details
Total words: 22
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510082.8% percentile
90.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos22 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 90.9%90.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 90.9%90.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 90.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 90.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos