Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andre Pagliarini results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Begging the Question, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 58.3% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 299.181 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,318 of 27,816 speakers). This Andre Pagliarini is worse (more manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
Andre Pagliarini
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510055.7% percentile
37.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 90.2%90.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 69.3%69.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 58.3%58.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 11.0%11.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 90.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 69.3%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 58.3%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos