Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Vincent Bevins results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 1,001 hits . Analysis detected 7,648 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,398 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,530 authors). This Vincent Bevins is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Vincent Bevins
Author details
Total words: 6,398
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 15.7% 15.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.3% 11.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.3% 6.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 15.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst